KROGER’S TRADEMARK INJUNCTION REQUEST AGAINST LIDL IS DENIED
By Joseph Mandour on July 27, 2017
Los Angeles – The Private Selection versus Preferred Selection trademark battle between grocery giants Kroger and Lidl will proceed, as a federal judge in Richmond Virginia has denied Kroger’s preliminary injunction request.
The issue at play is over alleged trademark infringement over the company’s logos for a sub-set of their products. Kroger has a logo for its “Private Selection” brand, found on more than 1,000 of its products. Lidl Read the rest
AMAZON’S MEAL KIT TRADEMARK FILING NEGATIVELY IMPACTS BLUE APRON
By Joseph Mandour on July 20, 2017
Orange County – In the latest Amazon empire expansion, on July 6, 2017 the company filed a trademark application for meal kits. The trademark application is for “We do the prep. You be the chef.” and is for a convenient service whereby frozen and prepared kits including meat, vegetables, pasta, etc. are delivered to your door. The trademark also covers a loyalty rewards program offering points and coupons for loyal customers. This potential service is great n Read the rest
NIKE OPPOSES ROB GRONKOWSKI’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
By Joseph Mandour on July 12, 2017
San Diego – Last year New England Patriot TE Rob Gronkowski’s company, Gronk Nation L.L.C, filed a trademark application of a silhouette of the NFL star doing his signature “end zone spike.” In response, Nike has filed a formal opposition with the US Patent and Trademark Office Trial and Appeal Board requesting that Gronk’s application be denied.
Nike Read the rest
FOREVER 21 SUES GUCCI, ATTEMPTS TO HAVE TRADEMARKS CANCELLED
By Joseph Mandour on July 6, 2017
Los Angeles – Los Angeles based fast-fashion company Forever 21, filed a lawsuit against the internationally famous Italian design house Gucci last week. This lawsuit is the latest development in a series of lawsuits by and against Forever 21.
The dispute between Gucci and Forever 21 began in October of 2016, when the Italian company sent a cease and desist letter to Forever 21. In the letter, Gucci demanded that Forever 21 cease all sales of cer Read the rest
THE SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN LAW BANNING OFFENSIVE TRADEMARKS
By Joseph Mandour on June 27, 2017
Orange County – The United States Supreme court has ruled in favor of an Asian American rock band who were refused by the trademark office when they applied to trademark their band name the Slants. In their decision, SCOTUS unanimously struck down part of a 71-year-old law that banned “disparaging” terms from being trademarked. According to the court ruling, the law that had banned offensive trademarks infringed on free speech rights, which are guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Simon Tam, the founder of The Slants, said he was “beyond humbled and thrilled” with the decision. According to Tam, the band did not ch Read the rest
OVER 30 TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN FILED FOR TRUMP “COVFEFE” TYPO
By Joseph Mandour on June 23, 2017
San Diego – On May 31st, 2017, at 12:06am, President Donald Trump tweeted, “Despite the constant negative press covfefe.” Very quickly thereafter, Covfefe went viral on social media. In the subsequent weeks, the word Covfefe has become a cultural phenomenon. It has been at the center of much debate and speculation, as people try to decide what happened during the President’s tweet.
Predictably, a large number of new trademark applications containing the word Covfefe were quickly filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). According to the USPTO Trademark Electronic Search System, more than 30 trademark applications have alr Read the rest
TIVO WINS A PRELIMINARY PATENT RULING IN THE ITC AGAINST #COMCAST
By Joseph Mandour on June 16, 2017
TiVo and Rovi (which purchased TiVo for $1.1 billion dollars last year) won an initial patent ruling in the International Trade Commission against Comcast. In the complaint against Comcast, TiVo claimed that Comcast had violated six patents. The ruling finds that Comcast, and its hardware partners Arris and Technicolor, had violated two patents held by TiVo.
The ruling is the latest development in a series of ongoing lawsuits between Comcast and TiVo. In addition to the ITC complaint, TiVo is in the midst of federal litigation against Comcast. TiVo sued Comcast and its top suppliers in 2016 for allegedly infringing 14 patents. The case is bei Read the rest
Posted in: Patent Infringement
IVANKA TRUMP’S COMPANY HAS FILED 14 ADDITIONAL TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS IN CHINA
By Joseph Mandour on June 8, 2017
Los Angeles – On March 28th, 2017, Ivanka Trump’s company filed for at least 14 trademarks in China. It is the latest wave of trademark applications filed by the Trump family companies. Last year, Ms. Trump’s company filed 36 applications. These trademark applications raise ethical concerns over the Trump family’s business ties while holding public office.
Specifically, there is concern that the Trumps are susceptible to influence from foreign nations. According the Larry Noble, general counsel for the US watchdog group, Campaign Legal Center, China knows that denying these trademarks would draw a negative reaction from the Preside Read the rest
SCHUTT SPORTS SUES RIDDELL OVER FOOTBALL HELMET PATENT INFRINGEMENT
By Joseph Mandour on June 2, 2017
Orange County – On May 18th 2017, Kranos Corp, operating as Schutt Sports, filed a lawsuit against Riddell Inc. for patent infringement. The two companies are market rivals in the football helmet design and manufacturing industry. Schutt Sports claims that Riddell has infringed three different helmet designs. Schutt is seeking an injunction as well as an undisclosed amount in damages.
Robert Erb, president and CEO of Schutt, in a statement to Read the rest
Posted in: Patent Infringement
PAYPAL CLAIMS TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT OVER THE PANDORA APP LOGO
By Joseph Mandour on May 25, 2017
San Diego – The famous online payment app, PayPal, is suing the famous online music streaming app, Pandora, for trademark infringement and trademark diffusion. The lawsuit, which was filed in Manhattan federal court, is in reaction to Pandora’s change of its logo late last year.
Trademark dilution varies from standard trademark infringement in that it focuses on famous trademarks. The law forbids the use of trademarks that are Read the rest