California Intellectual Property Blog

Background image

The U.S. Government Has a Kanye West Trademark Problem

The U.S. Government Has a Kanye West Trademark Problem

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) receives hundreds of thousands of trademark applications yearly. Each of these filings goes through a rigorous process. Only about half of these submissions receive trademark registrations. However, you’d expect this number to be much lower by looking at the success rate of Kanye West trademark applications.

In fact, around 350 applications filed by the singer’s trademark firm have failed in the last 12 months. However, these rejections were not related to the underlying validity of the trademarks in question. After all, “Yews” as a news service – one of the rapper’s applications – would’ve likely met the distinctiveness and commercial requirements of the USPTO.

As many might expect from the notorious celebrity, these rejections seem to stem exclusively from Kanye’s disorganized approach to… well, everything.

Hundreds of Kanye West Trademarks Denied

When Kanye West launched his “Yews” platform, many worried the name was an antisemitic bash on Jewish people. In reality, it was the hip hop star’s attempt at building his own news platform. The website didn’t last long, shutting down after less than a year. However, Kanye used his Ox Paha trademark company to file dozens of “Yews” applications during that time.

As of this writing, 20 of the 26 applications submitted to trademark the name have been rejected. Many of these seem nonsensical in nature, including attempts to register “Yews” for both agricultural and surgical supplies. However, this is only the tip of the iceberg. The USPTO has rejected at least 350 applications from Ox Paha Inc. over the last year.

In the majority of these cases, the filings became abandoned trademarks due to the applicant failing to submit the appropriate filings.

Kanye’s Abandoned Trademarks

One of the most important aspects of trademark law in America is commercial use. These brand identifiers must be distinctive, but brands must also use them commercially prior to registration. Applicants need to file a trademark Statement of Use (SOU) showing that this has occurred. In the majority of Kanye’s rejections, this basic requirement was not met.

In other instances, Kanye West trademarks became abandoned when communications from the USPTO were ignored. This seems to be the case with the attempt to trademark “Yews” for beverage services, among others. All told, the 350 rejected Ox Paha applications from the last 12 months were almost all due to abandonment – not any underlying issue with the trademarks themselves.

Unfortunately for Kanye, this seems par for the course with his company.

A Brand Hanging On for Dear Life

A cursory trademark search shows that Ox Paha hasn’t had a single successful trademark application in the past five years. However, the hundreds of failures from the last year don’t point towards an entrepreneur who has given up. Some of the applications to register “Yews” are still live in the USPTO system.

In these applications – such as the attempt to trademark “Yews” for legal services – the USPTO has not granted registration. Rather, they approved requests for extensions. Ox Paha asked for more time to submit a Statement of Use for the six applications that are still live. In addition to legal services, these applications cover Christmas decorations, electronic equipment, medical services, music streaming, and product design services.

Who knows? We might be able to sit around our Kanye West trademarked Christmas trees after visiting a “Yews” medical clinic in the near future. Assuming the necessary filings get submitted on time.

 

Another Brand Owns a Pokémon Trademark. Nintendo Strikes Back

Another Brand Owns a Pokémon Trademark. Nintendo Strikes Back

It seems unlikely that any franchise will ever dethrone Super Mario as Nintendo’s top seller. Still, Pokémon has made a lot of money for the gaming giant – overshadowing other popular titles like The Legend of Zelda and Animal Crossing. However, the franchise has encountered many intellectual property issues, including a wild Pokémon trademark dispute appearing out of nowhere.

Nintendo is no stranger to intellectual property disputes. They recently lost a Super Mario trademark case while still engaged in a battle against the Pocketpair brand over the Palworld game. However, the latest fight Nintendo has found itself in involves one of the brand’s most adorable characters: Jigglypuff.

Surprise: Jigglypuff Isn’t a Registered Pokémon Trademark

Certain names are synonymous with Pokémon. Pikachu is certainly one of them, and Charizard is also at the top of the list. However, Jigglypuff is undeniably a fan favorite. Considering the many licensing deals involving the character between Nintendo and other brands, one would assume that the gaming company owns a trademark registration for the character.

Not only would this assumption be inaccurate, but it turns out that another brand trademarked the word “Jigglypuff” several years ago. Back in 2022, the Yiwu FeiMeng Jewelry Company secured registration over “Jigglypuff” in trademark class 14, which essentially includes various jewelry items. Of course, Jigglypuff was an original Pokémon character from 1996.

This would give Nintendo priority over the word. Interestingly enough, the company never trademarked the name. Even after decades of use and licensing agreements, a company other than Nintendo managed to secure intellectual property rights over “Jigglypuff” with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

Gotta Catch ’em All: Nintendo Goes After Jigglypuff

In a trademark cancellation filing submitted on April 22, 2025, Nintendo claimed that the Yiwu FeiMeng Jewelry Company should not have rights over the word “Jigglypuff.” To be clear, Nintendo does not own a federal trademark registration for the popular character. In fact, Nintendo lists “NONE” as the trademark cited as justification for their cancellation request.

However, there’s no denying that “Jigglypuff” is directly linked to the Pokémon franchise in the minds of consumers. In the filing, Nintendo states that, for decades, they “used and licensed others to use the trademark JIGGLYPUFF with a broad variety of goods and services, including trading card games, toys, jewelry, phone accessories, clothing, and bags.”

This fact seems undeniable, and to be fair, Nintendo likely has common law trademark rights over the character, its name, and anything related to Jigglypuff. Still, the trademark issue at hand underscores the importance of filing a trademark application. Failing to do so has left Nintendo in its current situation.

What Happens Now?

Nintendo currently has a lot on its plate when it comes to intellectual property disputes. However, its battle with the Yiwu FeiMeng Jewelry Company is unlikely to result in major issues. After all, “Jigglypuff” is a fairly distinctive trademark – even if Nintendo failed to secure the appropriate federal paperwork.

When a consumer hears the word “Jigglypuff,” they many are likely to think about Pokémon. Nintendo’s filing further claims that the jewelry company never actually used the trademark in commerce. If true, this would end the matter as well.

As of now, the Yiwu FeiMeng Jewelry Company has until June 1, 2025, to file an answer with the USPTO if it wants to protect its registration. If Nintendo succeeds in its efforts, it’ll likely waste no time securing the trademark for Jigglypuff. For now, a victory for the jewelry company seems less likely than capturing a wild Mewtwo on your first attempt.

…or so the kids say.

Eagles Get Blindsided by New Brotherly Shove Trademarks

Eagles Get Blindsided by New Brotherly Shove Trademarks

It’s been just a few weeks since the Philadelphia Eagles submitted a trademark application for “Brotherly Shove.” Garnering trademark rights over the term wouldn’t stop other football teams from using the formation, but it would give the Eagles exclusive rights over the trademark in the commercial world. However, it seems like Philly has some competition.

Fight Breaks Out Over Brotherly Shove Trademark

When the Eagles submitted the application for the Brotherly Shove trademark, they were the only entity to have done so. The application was filed on October 10, 2023. However, they weren’t the only ones who would attempt to make it past the metaphorical line of scrimmage with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

Just eight days after the Eagles filed their application for the Brotherly Shove trademark, Inspired Synergy — a company in New Jersey — filed its own application. They requested exclusive use of the trademark for selling baseball hats. This puts the company in direct competition with the Eagles — who also want to use the term on hats.

However, that’s not where the story ends. On November 7, 2023 — nearly an entire month after the Eagles submitted their request for trademark registration — a filing by Lawrence Caplan sought trademark rights over the term “City of Brotherly Shove.” While the term used is slightly different, it would also be used on clothing. This would no doubt create a likelihood of confusion.

Can All Three Entities Have Rights Over “Brotherly Shove”?

Trademark registration typically doesn’t grant absolute rights over anything. This is just as true for “Brotherly Shove” as anything else. After all, we see companies like Delta Airlines and Delta Faucets coexist all the time. However, it seems highly unlikely that the three applications filed with the USPTO will result in three approved trademarks.

That’s because it’s probable that all three applicants are referring to the same football maneuver. And since all three applications say that their use of the term will be on clothing and hats, there is an apparent conflict between the involved parties. Even the application for “City of Brotherly Shove” is likely to cause issues.

That’s because using the same term on the same products would likely confuse consumers. Trademark rights are meant to ensure that consumers know the origin of their products. If three different companies release the same product with the same language, how will Eagles fans know their shirt comes from their favorite football team rather than some guy from Boca Raton (i.e., Mr. Caplan).

What Happens Next?

It’s doubtful that these three trademarks can coexist.  The appears that the first application filed will be approved while the other two are likely to receive office actions.  If the other parties then continue creating products featuring the term, they’re likely to open themselves up to a claim of trademark infringement. Fortunately, the USPTO will likely soon make a definite decision.

With multiple applications before the USPTO, trademark examiners will focus on who filed first. Judging by the three applications, there’s very little in the way of a trademark dispute here. That’s because the Eagles listed their date of first commercial use as October 3, 2023.

Meanwhile, Inspired Synergy states that they used the term commercially on October 18, 2023. Lawrence Caplan — who’s seeking the “City of Brotherly Shove” trademark — had not even used the term commercially at the time of his filing. Instead, he submitted an intent to use trademark application.

While the play that the Eagles are now know for has been highly successful, it’s highly unlikely that the other two parties will ever get their trademark into the end zone.

Reddit’s Battle for the WallStreetBets Trademark has Begun

WallStreetBets trademark battle has ensued

The stock market and hedge funds recently had a rough week thanks to the WallStreetBets Reddit community. Members of the group were able to drive up GameStop shares to historic levels. Hedge funds lost billions of dollars while some retail investors cashed in. It appears Reddit is also trying to cash in, though, by filing for a WallStreetBets trademark.

Reddit Files WallStreetBets Trademark Application

When Reddit members of the WallStreetBets community took notice of GameStop stock, so did the rest of the world. This led to over 177 million shares being traded for three consecutive days, and it drove a 52-week low of $2.57 per share to over $480 per share. The price has since plummeted back down to earth, but this doesn’t mean value is gone for everyone.

On February 8, Reddit, Inc. filed three separate trademark registrations for the name “WallStreetBets.” Each of these were for service marks to be used for entertainment services, telecommunication services, and social networking. If they secure the trademark for the name, they can profit from it for years to come.  Details of the trademark filings are available online.

Trademark Dispute Over Reddit’s WallStreetBets

The story of WallStreetBets captivated the world, and there are already some movie deals in place. Reddit’s filing for the trademark, however, isn’t the first time someone has sought ownership of WallStreetBets. Back in March 2020 – long before the GameStop fiasco occurred – Jaime Rogozinski sought to trademark the name.

Rogozinski is the original founder of the WallStreetBets community. Of course, the community itself exists on Reddit’s platform. This explains why the social media network has filed a Trademark Opposition against Rogozinski. The opposition was filed back in August 2020, though, again long before the group made headlines.

What we do see in the opposition filing, though, is that legal maneuvering picked back up when the community name went viral. Additionally, Rogozinski and Reddit aren’t the only ones trying to get a piece of a WallStreetBets trademark.  Applications were also filed by Next Computer Inc and Pilling Intellectual Property, LLC once the community gained international fame.

What Happens Next?

The astronomical increase in GameStop share value turned normal people into millionaires overnight. Thanks to the quick movie deal and sustained media coverage of the event, it appears as if there’s plenty more cash to milk from this situation. The question on everyone’s mind now is “who owns WallStreetBets?” The answer will have to play out before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

While the retail investor’s community may exist on Reddit, this doesn’t necessarily mean they own the trademark. If the founder of the group can show trademark use in commerce prior to Reddit’s, he might have a strong case against the social platform.